From our research
What this interview looks like
Most Indian institutes that interview applicants run a short panel of two to four people, usually faculty with an alumnus or external member, for ten to twenty minutes after a written test or shortlist. The panel opens from the application form and the entrance score rather than a self-introduction, asks why this programme and institute, and then probes the thing that matters most for the course: the portfolio and process at NIFT and NID, often alongside a hands-on situation or studio test; social awareness, field exposure and values at TISS; depth in the chosen subject and reading beyond the syllabus at St Stephen's, Ashoka and Christ; Class 12 concepts, numeracy and awareness at IIM IPM and BBA interviews; service attitude, grooming and industry awareness at NCHM and IHM counselling; and core undergraduate concepts, the project and research motivation at IISc, IIT and central-university research interviews. Most panels end with an ethics, teamwork or social-awareness question. The weight of the interview in the final merit varies widely: it is decisive at NID and TISS, around a third or less of the composite at NIFT and IIM IPM, and at IISc and IIT departments the interview is usually the only stage after the GATE, JAM or shortlist cut-off. The ExamPilot mock compresses this into fourteen minutes with an admissions dean who opens and closes, a programme director on motivation, a discipline faculty member on portfolio, aptitude and academics, and an alumna external member on situations, graded on fit and motivation, aptitude and depth, awareness and values, and communication.
Choose your post
6 posts available
Each post has its own panel, rounds and subject list.
What to expect
5 rounds, one after another
A four-member admission panel of the kind design schools, TISS, liberal-arts universities, IIM IPM, NCHM and research departments run after the written test or shortlist. The admissions dean opens from the application form, the programme director tests motivation and fit, a discipline faculty member probes the portfolio, aptitude or academic preparation for the chosen programme, an alumna or external member poses situations on ethics, teamwork and social awareness, and the dean closes. The panel grades genuine interest and depth over polish.
- Round 1
Opening from the application
· 2:00Settle the applicant and open from their form, not from a rehearsed self-introduction. Learn in two questions who they are, where they studied, and what they did outside the classroom, and form a first view of composure and honesty.
Dr. Meenakshi Raghavan1–2 questionsup to 1 follow-up each - Round 2
Why this programme, goals
· 3:00Test whether the applicant's reasons for choosing this programme and institute are their own, specific and informed, and whether their goals are realistic for what the programme actually teaches and where its graduates go.
Prof. Arvind Kulkarni2–3 questionsup to 2 follow-ups each - Round 3
Portfolio, aptitude and academic probing
· 5:00Probe the applicant's preparation for the discipline: the portfolio and process for design, the social-science reading and field exposure for TISS, the subject depth for liberal arts and research admissions, the business and numeracy sense for IPM and BBA, and the service orientation and awareness for hotel management. Find out whether they can go one level deeper and apply what they know.
Prof. Rohan Deshmukh3–4 questionsup to 2 follow-ups each - Round 4
Ethics, teamwork and social awareness
· 3:00Pose one or two situations an applicant will meet in the programme, in a hostel, in a group project or in the field, and see whether they reason with fairness and empathy, take a position, and hold or revise it gracefully when pushed.
Ms. Ananya Bhattacharya1–2 questionsup to 1 follow-up each - Round 5
Closing
· 1:00Close courteously and neutrally, without feedback or any signal about the outcome.
Dr. Meenakshi Raghavan1–1 questions
Meet the panel
Your AI interviewers
Distinct personas, voices and questioning styles, briefed on this interview.
Dr. Meenakshi Raghavan
ChairChairperson
Dean of Admissions and Professor of Sociology, central university; formerly chaired TISS and liberal-arts admission panels
Warm, unhurried, reads the form closely and remembers every line of it.
Female voice · 3 languages
Prof. Arvind Kulkarni
Hiring manager
Programme Director, undergraduate and postgraduate admissions; has run programmes in management, hospitality and design education
Direct, curious, allergic to generic answers, fair about backups and parental pressure.
Male voice · 3 languages
Prof. Rohan Deshmukh
Subject expert
Faculty member, design and interdisciplinary studies; portfolio reviewer and studio-test examiner, formerly research supervisor at an institute of national importance
Attentive, hands-on, interested in process and decisions, never impressed by polish alone.
Male voice · 3 languages
Ms. Ananya Bhattacharya
External member
Alumna and external member on admission panels; development-sector professional, formerly product designer and campus-placement mentor
Friendly, grounded, interested in how the applicant treats other people.
Female voice · 3 languages
Languages
Answer in the language you think in
Interviewers speak and understand each language natively. Switch mid-answer if you like.
- English
- हिंदीHindi
- Hinglish (Hindi + English)Hinglish
How scoring works
A report you can act on
Every round is scored on the rubric
Each interviewer scores only the criteria their round covers. Weights add up to your overall score out of 100.
Only what you actually said counts
Feedback quotes your own answers. Rounds you skip show as “Not assessed” rather than a zero.
Communication is always measured
Fluency, clarity, confidence and structure are tracked across the whole interview, in any language.
Pass mark, then a plan
You see the pass mark for this interview, your gaps, and the courses that close them fastest.
Scored on
- Fit and motivation30%
Why this programme, this institute and this field hang together with the applicant's school or college record, projects and interests; goals are specific and realistic for the programme; the applicant knows what the programme actually teaches and how it differs from the alternatives; honest about other options and backups.
- Aptitude and depth35%
Can talk about their own portfolio, project, reading or academic work in concrete detail, explain decisions and process, go one level deeper on a follow-up, apply a concept to a new case, and admit the edge of their knowledge rather than bluff.
- Awareness and values20%
Reasons through an ethics, teamwork or social situation with fairness and empathy; shows awareness of the society and industry the programme serves; takes a position and defends it without rigidity or evasion.
- Communication15%
Answers the question asked in one to three clear sentences before elaborating; listens; structured, natural and unrehearsed; language is clear whether English, Hindi or mixed.
Pass mark 60 / 100 · UG/PG admission interview — faculty panel with portfolio or aptitude probe
Also live now
Job & campus interviews
Private-sector job interviews
Realistic hiring loops for experienced professionals and career switchers in software, product and design, sales and marketing, finance and operations, HR and admin, and customer-facing roles.
Job & campus interviews
Campus placements & internships
Placement-season interviews for final-year students and recent graduates: IT services technical + HR rounds, core-engineering rounds, MBA summer-placement PIs and internship interviews.
Job & campus interviews
Communication & leadership check-ins
Short, repeatable conversations for working professionals: promotion panels, client-facing role checks and single hiring-manager rounds, focused on judgement, influence and clear communication.
Keep exploring