From our research
What this interview looks like
Most Indian institutes that interview applicants run a short panel of two to four people, usually faculty with an alumnus or external member, for ten to twenty minutes after a written test or shortlist. The panel opens from the application form and the entrance score rather than a self-introduction, asks why this programme and institute, and then probes the thing that matters most for the course: the portfolio and process at NIFT and NID, often alongside a hands-on situation or studio test; social awareness, field exposure and values at TISS; depth in the chosen subject and reading beyond the syllabus at St Stephen's, Ashoka and Christ; Class 12 concepts, numeracy and awareness at IIM IPM and BBA interviews; service attitude, grooming and industry awareness at NCHM and IHM counselling; and core undergraduate concepts, the project and research motivation at IISc, IIT and central-university research interviews. Most panels end with an ethics, teamwork or social-awareness question. The weight of the interview in the final merit varies widely: it is decisive at NID and TISS, around a third or less of the composite at NIFT and IIM IPM, and at IISc and IIT departments the interview is usually the only stage after the GATE, JAM or shortlist cut-off. The ExamPilot mock compresses this into fourteen minutes with an admissions dean who opens and closes, a programme director on motivation, a discipline faculty member on portfolio, aptitude and academics, and an alumna external member on situations, graded on fit and motivation, aptitude and depth, awareness and values, and communication.
How it is weighted
St Stephen's has historically weighed the interview at around fifteen percent of the final selection, with the entrance score carrying the rest, subject to the year's policy. At Ashoka and similar universities the interview, essays and test are considered together holistically, with no published weights. At Christ University the skill assessment, micro-presentation and personal interview together carry a meaningful share of the selection alongside the entrance test and Class 12 or graduation marks, with exact weights varying by programme. Journalism schools weigh the interview heavily after the written test.
Who this is for
For UG, Class 12 or equivalent with the college's cut-off or entrance: St Stephen's shortlists on CUET and runs an interview for a share of the final score; Ashoka, Krea and FLAME use their own applications with essays, an aptitude test and an interview; journalism programmes at IIMC, ACJ and Xavier's run their own entrance followed by an interview. For PG at Christ University, a bachelor's degree and the university's selection process of an entrance test, a micro-presentation and a personal interview, which varies by programme.
The panel focuses on
- Why this subject and this college, and what you expect to read and do in year one
- Depth in a chosen subject: one concept or text explained with your own interpretation and defended against a counter-reading
- Reading beyond the syllabus and what you disagreed with in it
- Thinking aloud on an unfamiliar question or a current issue, with a position and the strongest counter-argument
- Your essay or statement of purpose, and whether you can go deeper than what you wrote
- Extracurriculars, writing or media work with ownership and honest reflection
Step 1
Pick your subject
The expert on the panel probes these areas at the level of this post. Optional here; you can choose during setup.
Step 2
Choose how you want to be interviewed
1:1 interview
One interviewer runs every round and adapts the focus as you go. Lower pressure; ideal for a first attempt.
Dr. Meenakshi Raghavan
Chairperson
Panel interview · 4 members
Most realisticEach member leads their own round and hands over to the next. They hear each other, so a weak answer will be revisited.
Dr. Meenakshi Raghavan
Chairperson
Prof. Arvind Kulkarni
Hiring manager
Prof. Rohan Deshmukh
Subject expert
Ms. Ananya Bhattacharya
External member
What to expect
5 rounds · 14 minutes
A four-member admission panel of the kind design schools, TISS, liberal-arts universities, IIM IPM, NCHM and research departments run after the written test or shortlist. The admissions dean opens from the application form, the programme director tests motivation and fit, a discipline faculty member probes the portfolio, aptitude or academic preparation for the chosen programme, an alumna or external member poses situations on ethics, teamwork and social awareness, and the dean closes. The panel grades genuine interest and depth over polish.
- Round 1
Opening from the application
· 2:00Settle the applicant and open from their form, not from a rehearsed self-introduction. Learn in two questions who they are, where they studied, and what they did outside the classroom, and form a first view of composure and honesty.
Dr. Meenakshi Raghavan1–2 questionsup to 1 follow-up each - Round 2
Why this programme, goals
· 3:00Test whether the applicant's reasons for choosing this programme and institute are their own, specific and informed, and whether their goals are realistic for what the programme actually teaches and where its graduates go.
Prof. Arvind Kulkarni2–3 questionsup to 2 follow-ups each - Round 3
Portfolio, aptitude and academic probing
· 5:00Probe the applicant's preparation for the discipline: the portfolio and process for design, the social-science reading and field exposure for TISS, the subject depth for liberal arts and research admissions, the business and numeracy sense for IPM and BBA, and the service orientation and awareness for hotel management. Find out whether they can go one level deeper and apply what they know.
Prof. Rohan Deshmukh3–4 questionsup to 2 follow-ups each - Round 4
Ethics, teamwork and social awareness
· 3:00Pose one or two situations an applicant will meet in the programme, in a hostel, in a group project or in the field, and see whether they reason with fairness and empathy, take a position, and hold or revise it gracefully when pushed.
Ms. Ananya Bhattacharya1–2 questionsup to 1 follow-up each - Round 5
Closing
· 1:00Close courteously and neutrally, without feedback or any signal about the outcome.
Dr. Meenakshi Raghavan1–1 questions
Sample questions
Admission interviews Liberal arts / Christ interview questions
Questions panels commonly ask in the Admission interviews Liberal arts / Christ interview, with what a strong answer covers. Practise them aloud with the AI panel.
- Subject depth
You want to study history. Tell us about one historical event where you think the textbook explanation is too simple.
What a strong answer covers
Names an event, explains the standard view, offers additional causes or perspectives from wider reading, and supports the point with evidence. Avoid controversial claims without sources.
- Reading
Name something you read outside the syllabus in the last six months. Which argument in it did you find unconvincing, and why?
What a strong answer covers
Names a real book or long essay, summarises its argument, and explains a specific disagreement with reasons. Avoid naming a book you have not finished.
- Statement of purpose
Your statement of purpose mentions climate justice. What does the phrase mean to you, and what would a sceptic say back?
What a strong answer covers
Explains how climate impacts fall unequally on poorer communities and countries, and engages fairly with counter-arguments such as development needs. Avoid repeating slogans from the essay.
- Thinking aloud
Should social media platforms be held responsible for misinformation shared by users? Take a position and defend it.
What a strong answer covers
A clear stance with reasons and a concrete example, an awareness of the practical limits of moderation at scale, and the strongest counter-argument on free speech or censorship. Avoid shifting positions under pressure without a reason.
- Journalism
For journalism, what is the difference between reporting and opinion, and how do you keep them separate?
What a strong answer covers
Reporting presents verified facts with attributed sources and lets readers judge, while opinion argues a view openly. A strong answer mentions labelling, separate desks or pages, verification before publishing and correcting errors visibly. Avoid claiming perfect neutrality is easy or that facts and opinion never blur.
- Fit
Why this college rather than a larger university with more courses?
What a strong answer covers
Specific features such as the tutorial or residential system, the interdisciplinary foundation courses, a named society or faculty interest, linked to how the candidate learns best. Avoid answering with reputation, alumni names or rankings alone, which every other applicant can also say.
- Extracurriculars
Tell us about a school or college project where you were responsible for the outcome, and the moment it nearly fell apart.
What a strong answer covers
A specific activity such as a magazine, debate society or fundraiser, the candidate's actual role, the crisis, the decision taken and what it taught them about working with people. Avoid stories with no setback or where the candidate did everything alone.
- Economics
For economics, explain why rent control might reduce housing supply in a city like Mumbai.
What a strong answer covers
Explains that capped rents reduce landlords' incentive to maintain or let property, encourage informal arrangements and slow new supply over time, while acknowledging that controls protected long-standing tenants. A strong answer weighs both. Avoid one-sided arguments or invented figures about Mumbai housing.
- Writing
If you wrote one piece for the college magazine on a problem in your own neighbourhood, what would the headline be, and whom would you interview?
What a strong answer covers
A clear, specific topic, a sharp angle, named types of sources such as residents, an official and an expert, and awareness of fairness to all sides. Avoid vague topics like pollution in general with no local reporting plan.
Reading is not rehearsing. Answer these out loud to an AI Admission interviews Liberal arts / Christ panel that follows up like the real one.
Practise these questionsMeet the panel
Your AI interviewers
Distinct personas, voices and questioning styles, briefed on this post.
Dr. Meenakshi Raghavan
ChairChairperson
Dean of Admissions and Professor of Sociology, central university; formerly chaired TISS and liberal-arts admission panels
Warm, unhurried, reads the form closely and remembers every line of it.
Female voice · 3 languages
Prof. Arvind Kulkarni
Hiring manager
Programme Director, undergraduate and postgraduate admissions; has run programmes in management, hospitality and design education
Direct, curious, allergic to generic answers, fair about backups and parental pressure.
Male voice · 3 languages
Prof. Rohan Deshmukh
Subject expert
Faculty member, design and interdisciplinary studies; portfolio reviewer and studio-test examiner, formerly research supervisor at an institute of national importance
Attentive, hands-on, interested in process and decisions, never impressed by polish alone.
Male voice · 3 languages
Ms. Ananya Bhattacharya
External member
Alumna and external member on admission panels; development-sector professional, formerly product designer and campus-placement mentor
Friendly, grounded, interested in how the applicant treats other people.
Female voice · 3 languages
Languages
Answer in the language you think in
The panel asks in your chosen language. Switch mid-answer if you like.
- English
- हिंदीHindi
- Hinglish (Hindi + English)Hinglish
How scoring works
A report you can act on
Every round is scored on the rubric
Each interviewer scores only the criteria their round covers. Weights add up to your overall score out of 100.
Only what you actually said counts
Feedback quotes your own answers. Rounds you skip show as “Not assessed” rather than a zero.
Communication is always measured
Fluency, clarity, confidence and structure are tracked across the whole interview, in any language.
Pass mark, then a plan
You see the pass mark for this interview, your gaps, and the courses that close them fastest.
Scored on
- Fit and motivation30%
Why this programme, this institute and this field hang together with the applicant's school or college record, projects and interests; goals are specific and realistic for the programme; the applicant knows what the programme actually teaches and how it differs from the alternatives; honest about other options and backups.
- Aptitude and depth35%
Can talk about their own portfolio, project, reading or academic work in concrete detail, explain decisions and process, go one level deeper on a follow-up, apply a concept to a new case, and admit the edge of their knowledge rather than bluff.
- Awareness and values20%
Reasons through an ethics, teamwork or social situation with fairness and empathy; shows awareness of the society and industry the programme serves; takes a position and defends it without rigidity or evasion.
- Communication15%
Answers the question asked in one to three clear sentences before elaborating; listens; structured, natural and unrehearsed; language is clear whether English, Hindi or mixed.
Pass mark 60 / 100 · UG/PG admission interview — faculty panel with portfolio or aptitude probe
Keep exploring
More Admission interviews interviews
- Admission interviews NIFT / NID design interviewClass 12 pass or appearing for B.Des and BFTech; graduates for M.Des and MFTech
- Admission interviews TISS / social sciences interviewGraduates and final-year students; TISS, Azim Premji, IIT HSS, central-university MA programmes
- Admission interviews IPM / BBA interviewClass 12 pass or appearing, typically 17 to 20 years
- Admission interviews NCHM / IHM interviewClass 12 pass with English for BSc HHA; graduates for PG Diploma and MSc
- Admission interviews Research / PG entrance interviewGraduates and postgraduates with GATE, JAM, NET, CUET-PG or a university entrance score