From our research
What this interview looks like
A university selection committee for Assistant Professor is chaired by the Vice-Chancellor or their nominee and includes three subject experts, typically from outside the university, along with nominees for the academic council and for reserved categories; a college committee is chaired by the principal or governing-body chair with external subject experts. Candidates are shortlisted on the UGC academic and research score, which is built from academic record, research publications, teaching or research experience and awards, so the interview is the final discriminator among already-qualified applicants. The real interview usually runs fifteen to thirty minutes: the chair opens from the application, subject experts probe the discipline at research level, one member examines the doctoral work or research plan, and many institutions ask for a short demonstration lecture or a two-minute explanation of a concept. PhD admission interviews at IITs, IISc and central universities follow the UGC 2022 PhD regulations or the institute's own rules: a written test or NET or JRF exemption, then a departmental committee interview that weighs the research proposal, subject fundamentals and fit with a supervisor, commonly around thirty percent of the admission score. JRF, project-assistant and research-associate interviews are shorter panels led by the principal investigator, focused on fundamentals, methods and the specific project. The ExamPilot mock compresses all of this into eighteen minutes: profile, subject depth, research methodology and thesis defence, a two-minute teaching demonstration, and a formal close.
Choose your post
6 posts available
Each post has its own panel, rounds and subject list.
What to expect
5 rounds, one after another
A university selection-committee interview in the UGC 2018 pattern, also used for PhD admission and JRF or project-fellow interviews. The chairperson opens from the candidate's academic profile and API record, a subject expert probes domain mastery at research level, an external member tests research methodology and defends the thesis or proposal, and a pedagogy expert asks for a two-minute mini-lecture on a concept. The committee assesses subject mastery, research aptitude, teaching ability and communication, not recall.
- Round 1
Academic profile
· 3:00Set a formal but courteous tone and open the candidate's academic profile as a real selection committee does: research and teaching record, NET or JRF or PhD status, API score components, publications and their venues, and why this institution and this post. Form a first view of honesty and clarity.
Prof. Sudha Raghunathan2–3 questionsup to 1 follow-up each - Round 2
Subject depth
· 6:00Test mastery of the candidate's discipline at postgraduate and research level: conceptual understanding, ability to connect topics, awareness of the current frontier, and whether they can reason when pushed beyond what they have memorised.
Prof. Nikhil Bhattacharya3–4 questionsup to 2 follow-ups each - Round 3
Research methodology & thesis defence
· 4:00Assess research aptitude in the candidate's discipline: how they framed their doctoral or proposed problem, the design and method and its limits, validity and reproducibility, ethics and publication practice, and whether they can defend their work against a referee-style objection and sketch a realistic research plan.
Dr. Ramesh Chandra Pandey2–3 questionsup to 2 follow-ups each - Round 4
Two-minute teaching demonstration
· 4:00Assess whether the candidate can teach: explain one concept from their discipline to a stated undergraduate audience in about two minutes, with a motivating example, correct sequence, and a check for understanding, and then reflect on a pedagogical choice.
Mrs. Kavita Nair1–2 questionsup to 1 follow-up each - Round 5
Closing
· 1:00Close the interview courteously and formally, as a selection committee does, without feedback or any hint about the outcome.
Prof. Sudha Raghunathan1–1 questions
Meet the panel
Your AI interviewers
Distinct personas, voices and questioning styles, briefed on this interview.
Prof. Sudha Raghunathan
ChairChairperson
Dean of Faculty and Vice-Chancellor's nominee; chairs university selection committees under the UGC 2018 regulations
Formal, precise, courteous, impossible to rush.
Female voice · 3 languages
Prof. Nikhil Bhattacharya
Subject expert
Professor at an IIT; subject expert on university selection committees and departmental research committees
Rigorous, curious, allergic to keyword answers.
Male voice · 4 languages
Dr. Ramesh Chandra Pandey
External member
Research methodology expert; former Dean of Research; reviewer for UGC-CARE journals and DST-SERB project panels
Referee-like, fair, methodical, values honest limitations.
Male voice · 3 languages
Mrs. Kavita Nair
Pedagogy expert
Vice Principal & pedagogy expert
Practical, classroom-focused, encouraging.
Female voice · 4 languages
Shri Devendra Singh Rathore, IAS (Retd.)
Chairperson
Former Secretary to Government of India; UPSC-style board chairperson
Measured, senior, tests balance and composure.
Male voice · 2 languages
Prof. Arvind Sharma
Subject expert
Subject expert, university faculty (KVS panel)
Rigorous, probing, fair.
Male voice · 3 languages
Dr. Lakshmi Iyer
External member
External member, university department of education (NCERT/CBSE resource person)
Policy-aware, thoughtful, expects reflection.
Female voice · 4 languages
Languages
Answer in the language you think in
Interviewers speak and understand each language natively. Switch mid-answer if you like.
- English
- हिंदीHindi
How scoring works
A report you can act on
Every round is scored on the rubric
Each interviewer scores only the criteria their round covers. Weights add up to your overall score out of 100.
Only what you actually said counts
Feedback quotes your own answers. Rounds you skip show as “Not assessed” rather than a zero.
Communication is always measured
Fluency, clarity, confidence and structure are tracked across the whole interview, in any language.
Pass mark, then a plan
You see the pass mark for this interview, your gaps, and the courses that close them fastest.
Scored on
- Subject mastery35%
Depth and accuracy at postgraduate and research level: explains the why behind results, connects sub-fields, knows the current frontier of the discipline, corrects a wrong premise, and does not hide behind definitions or name-dropping.
- Research aptitude25%
Can state a research question precisely, justify the design and method, acknowledge limitations honestly, defend a thesis or proposal against a referee-style objection, and outline a realistic research plan with funding and publication awareness.
- Teaching ability20%
Explains a concept to a stated audience in two minutes with a motivating example, correct sequencing and a check for understanding; adapts when the learner is confused; shows awareness of UG assessment and NEP 2020 realities.
- Communication & academic bearing20%
Concise, structured speech; listens to the question actually asked; composure when challenged; admits not knowing without bluffing; collegial tone towards the committee.
Pass mark 60 / 100 · Academic selection committee — Assistant Professor / PhD / JRF
Also live now
Job & campus interviews
Private-sector job interviews
Realistic hiring loops for experienced professionals and career switchers in software, product and design, sales and marketing, finance and operations, HR and admin, and customer-facing roles.
Job & campus interviews
Campus placements & internships
Placement-season interviews for final-year students and recent graduates: IT services technical + HR rounds, core-engineering rounds, MBA summer-placement PIs and internship interviews.
Job & campus interviews
Communication & leadership check-ins
Short, repeatable conversations for working professionals: promotion panels, client-facing role checks and single hiring-manager rounds, focused on judgement, influence and clear communication.
Keep exploring