From our research
What this interview looks like
A university selection committee for Assistant Professor is chaired by the Vice-Chancellor or their nominee and includes three subject experts, typically from outside the university, along with nominees for the academic council and for reserved categories; a college committee is chaired by the principal or governing-body chair with external subject experts. Candidates are shortlisted on the UGC academic and research score, which is built from academic record, research publications, teaching or research experience and awards, so the interview is the final discriminator among already-qualified applicants. The real interview usually runs fifteen to thirty minutes: the chair opens from the application, subject experts probe the discipline at research level, one member examines the doctoral work or research plan, and many institutions ask for a short demonstration lecture or a two-minute explanation of a concept. PhD admission interviews at IITs, IISc and central universities follow the UGC 2022 PhD regulations or the institute's own rules: a written test or NET or JRF exemption, then a departmental committee interview that weighs the research proposal, subject fundamentals and fit with a supervisor, commonly around thirty percent of the admission score. JRF, project-assistant and research-associate interviews are shorter panels led by the principal investigator, focused on fundamentals, methods and the specific project. The ExamPilot mock compresses all of this into eighteen minutes: profile, subject depth, research methodology and thesis defence, a two-minute teaching demonstration, and a formal close.
How it is weighted
Shortlisting on the academic and research score; the committee interview and, in most business schools, a demo lecture or case-teaching demonstration decide the outcome. Splits vary by institution.
Who this is for
For commerce: master's with at least 55 percent and UGC-NET or SET, or a PhD. For management: a first-class master's such as an MBA or PGDM with NET, or a PhD, with professional qualifications like CA, CMA or CS and industry experience valued by many institutions per AICTE and UGC norms.
The panel focuses on
- Technical accuracy on accounting standards, finance theory and management research
- Indian institutional context: Companies Act, SEBI, GST, RBI, MSMEs
- Research design: event studies, panel data, surveys, case method and their pitfalls
- The thesis contribution and how it would be refereed
- Two-minute concept demonstration or case-teaching sample
- Industry connect, consultancy and a publication plan
Step 1
Pick your subject
The expert on the panel probes these areas at the level of this post. Optional here; you can choose during setup.
Step 2
Choose how you want to be interviewed
1:1 interview
One interviewer runs every round and adapts the focus as you go. Lower pressure; ideal for a first attempt.
Prof. Arvind Sharma
Subject expert
Panel interview · 4 members
Most realisticEach member leads their own round and hands over to the next. They hear each other, so a weak answer will be revisited.
Shri Devendra Singh Rathore, IAS (Retd.)
Chairperson
Prof. Arvind Sharma
Subject expert
Dr. Lakshmi Iyer
External member
Mrs. Kavita Nair
Pedagogy expert
What to expect
5 rounds · 18 minutes
A university selection-committee interview in the UGC 2018 pattern, also used for PhD admission and JRF or project-fellow interviews. The chairperson opens from the candidate's academic profile and API record, a subject expert probes domain mastery at research level, an external member tests research methodology and defends the thesis or proposal, and a pedagogy expert asks for a two-minute mini-lecture on a concept. The committee assesses subject mastery, research aptitude, teaching ability and communication, not recall.
- Round 1
Academic profile
· 3:00Set a formal but courteous tone and open the candidate's academic profile as a real selection committee does: research and teaching record, NET or JRF or PhD status, API score components, publications and their venues, and why this institution and this post. Form a first view of honesty and clarity.
Shri Devendra Singh Rathore, IAS (Retd.)2–3 questionsup to 1 follow-up each - Round 2
Subject depth
· 6:00Test mastery of the candidate's discipline at postgraduate and research level: conceptual understanding, ability to connect topics, awareness of the current frontier, and whether they can reason when pushed beyond what they have memorised.
Prof. Arvind Sharma3–4 questionsup to 2 follow-ups each - Round 3
Research methodology & thesis defence
· 4:00Assess research aptitude in the candidate's discipline: how they framed their doctoral or proposed problem, the design and method and its limits, validity and reproducibility, ethics and publication practice, and whether they can defend their work against a referee-style objection and sketch a realistic research plan.
Dr. Lakshmi Iyer2–3 questionsup to 2 follow-ups each - Round 4
Two-minute teaching demonstration
· 4:00Assess whether the candidate can teach: explain one concept from their discipline to a stated undergraduate audience in about two minutes, with a motivating example, correct sequence, and a check for understanding, and then reflect on a pedagogical choice.
Mrs. Kavita Nair1–2 questionsup to 1 follow-up each - Round 5
Closing
· 1:00Close the interview courteously and formally, as a selection committee does, without feedback or any hint about the outcome.
Shri Devendra Singh Rathore, IAS (Retd.)1–1 questions
Sample questions
Asst. Prof. Asst. Prof. (Com. & Mgmt.) interview questions
Questions panels commonly ask in the Asst. Prof. Asst. Prof. (Com. & Mgmt.) interview, with what a strong answer covers. Practise them aloud with the AI panel.
- Accounting standards
Explain the difference between Ind AS and the older Indian GAAP in terms a final-year B.Com student would understand.
What a strong answer covers
Ind AS converges with international reporting standards, emphasising fair value and substance over form, applied to specified companies; older Indian GAAP was more historical-cost based. Avoid listing standards without explaining the shift.
- Case teaching
Teach us the idea of working capital using a small garment business in Tiruppur as a case, in two minutes.
What a strong answer covers
Explains current assets and liabilities, cash cycle from raw material to receivables, and why delays in payments squeeze cash. Avoid only formulas without the business story.
- Research design
Your thesis used an event study of stock price reactions to announcements. What assumptions does that method make, and what could bias your results?
What a strong answer covers
Names the assumptions: markets absorb information quickly, the estimation window reflects normal returns, and the event date is correctly identified. Discusses confounding announcements, thin trading in small Indian stocks and the choice of market model. Avoid presenting abnormal returns without discussing these threats.
- Institutional context
What does SEBI regulate, and how is that different from what the RBI regulates?
What a strong answer covers
SEBI regulates securities markets, listed company disclosures, mutual funds and market intermediaries to protect investors, while the RBI conducts monetary policy and regulates banks, NBFCs and payment systems. A strong answer gives one example where both matter. Avoid mixing up their roles.
- Survey research
How would you design a survey to study employee engagement in Indian IT firms, and how would you avoid common biases?
What a strong answer covers
Clear constructs, validated scales, pilot testing, sampling frame and anonymity, and checks for common method bias. Avoid leading questions or convenience-only data without acknowledging limits.
- Taxation
Explain GST input tax credit with a simple example, and why small businesses sometimes struggle with it.
What a strong answer covers
Shows tax paid on inputs offsets tax on outputs, prevents cascading, and explains compliance issues such as supplier filing and paperwork. Avoid using incorrect rates.
- Industry connect
How do you plan to connect your teaching with industry, for example through live projects or consultancy?
What a strong answer covers
Concrete plans such as live projects with local firms, guest sessions by practitioners, internship mentoring and consultancy within institutional rules, with one company or sector the candidate already has contacts in. Avoid vague promises of industry tie-ups with no names or mechanism.
- Thesis contribution
A referee says your management study lacks theoretical contribution. How would you respond?
What a strong answer covers
Clarifies which theory the study speaks to, states whether it extends, qualifies or challenges it, and shows how the Indian context adds something the theory did not anticipate, while accepting valid criticism. Avoid defensiveness or claiming a purely empirical paper needs no theory.
- Current developments
What is one major change in Indian business regulation in recent years, and how would you teach it?
What a strong answer covers
A real change such as the insolvency framework, GST or the labour codes, described accurately in outline, with its rationale, an effect on firms, and a teaching plan using a short case. Avoid stating dates, thresholds or provisions you are not sure of.
Reading is not rehearsing. Answer these out loud to an AI Asst. Prof. Asst. Prof. (Com. & Mgmt.) panel that follows up like the real one.
Practise these questionsMeet the panel
Your AI interviewers
Distinct personas, voices and questioning styles, briefed on this post.
Shri Devendra Singh Rathore, IAS (Retd.)
ChairChairperson
Former Secretary to Government of India; UPSC-style board chairperson
Measured, senior, tests balance and composure.
Male voice · 2 languages
Prof. Arvind Sharma
Subject expert
Subject expert, university faculty (KVS panel)
Rigorous, probing, fair.
Male voice · 3 languages
Dr. Lakshmi Iyer
External member
External member, university department of education (NCERT/CBSE resource person)
Policy-aware, thoughtful, expects reflection.
Female voice · 4 languages
Mrs. Kavita Nair
Pedagogy expert
Vice Principal & pedagogy expert
Practical, classroom-focused, encouraging.
Female voice · 4 languages
Languages
Answer in the language you think in
The panel asks in your chosen language. Switch mid-answer if you like.
- English
- हिंदीHindi
How scoring works
A report you can act on
Every round is scored on the rubric
Each interviewer scores only the criteria their round covers. Weights add up to your overall score out of 100.
Only what you actually said counts
Feedback quotes your own answers. Rounds you skip show as “Not assessed” rather than a zero.
Communication is always measured
Fluency, clarity, confidence and structure are tracked across the whole interview, in any language.
Pass mark, then a plan
You see the pass mark for this interview, your gaps, and the courses that close them fastest.
Scored on
- Subject mastery35%
Depth and accuracy at postgraduate and research level: explains the why behind results, connects sub-fields, knows the current frontier of the discipline, corrects a wrong premise, and does not hide behind definitions or name-dropping.
- Research aptitude25%
Can state a research question precisely, justify the design and method, acknowledge limitations honestly, defend a thesis or proposal against a referee-style objection, and outline a realistic research plan with funding and publication awareness.
- Teaching ability20%
Explains a concept to a stated audience in two minutes with a motivating example, correct sequencing and a check for understanding; adapts when the learner is confused; shows awareness of UG assessment and NEP 2020 realities.
- Communication & academic bearing20%
Concise, structured speech; listens to the question actually asked; composure when challenged; admits not knowing without bluffing; collegial tone towards the committee.
Pass mark 60 / 100 · Academic selection committee — Assistant Professor / PhD / JRF
Keep exploring
More Asst. Prof. interviews
- Asst. Prof. Asst. Prof. (Engg.) interviewFaculty, entry grade (Academic Level 10)
- Asst. Prof. Asst. Prof. (Science) interviewFaculty, entry grade (Academic Level 10)
- Asst. Prof. Asst. Prof. (Hum. & SS) interviewFaculty, entry grade (Academic Level 10)
- Asst. Prof. PhD interview interviewDoctoral admission
- Asst. Prof. JRF / Project fellow interviewResearch fellowship or project staff