From our research
What this interview looks like
A university selection committee for Assistant Professor is chaired by the Vice-Chancellor or their nominee and includes three subject experts, typically from outside the university, along with nominees for the academic council and for reserved categories; a college committee is chaired by the principal or governing-body chair with external subject experts. Candidates are shortlisted on the UGC academic and research score, which is built from academic record, research publications, teaching or research experience and awards, so the interview is the final discriminator among already-qualified applicants. The real interview usually runs fifteen to thirty minutes: the chair opens from the application, subject experts probe the discipline at research level, one member examines the doctoral work or research plan, and many institutions ask for a short demonstration lecture or a two-minute explanation of a concept. PhD admission interviews at IITs, IISc and central universities follow the UGC 2022 PhD regulations or the institute's own rules: a written test or NET or JRF exemption, then a departmental committee interview that weighs the research proposal, subject fundamentals and fit with a supervisor, commonly around thirty percent of the admission score. JRF, project-assistant and research-associate interviews are shorter panels led by the principal investigator, focused on fundamentals, methods and the specific project. The ExamPilot mock compresses all of this into eighteen minutes: profile, subject depth, research methodology and thesis defence, a two-minute teaching demonstration, and a formal close.
How it is weighted
Under the UGC PhD Regulations 2022 pattern the interview typically carries about 30 percent against 70 percent for the entrance test, with NET or JRF holders often exempt from the test; IITs and IISc follow their own schemes where the interview is usually decisive after screening.
Who this is for
Master's degree, or in some engineering departments a four-year bachelor's with a strong record, meeting the institute's marks or CGPA criteria; a written test or departmental screening unless exempt through UGC-NET, CSIR-NET, JRF, GATE or an institute fellowship. Candidates submit a research proposal or statement of purpose and are interviewed by a departmental research committee.
The panel focuses on
- Master's-level fundamentals in the chosen area, with derivations on the board
- The research proposal or statement of purpose: question, gap, method, feasibility
- Why this problem, why this department, which supervisor and why
- Reading of recent literature and ability to critique a paper
- Readiness for the first-year coursework and comprehensive examination
- Fellowship status, time commitment and realistic timelines
Step 1
Pick your subject
The expert on the panel probes these areas at the level of this post. Optional here; you can choose during setup.
Step 2
Choose how you want to be interviewed
1:1 interview
One interviewer runs every round and adapts the focus as you go. Lower pressure; ideal for a first attempt.
Prof. Nikhil Bhattacharya
Subject expert
Panel interview · 4 members
Most realisticEach member leads their own round and hands over to the next. They hear each other, so a weak answer will be revisited.
Prof. Sudha Raghunathan
Chairperson
Prof. Nikhil Bhattacharya
Subject expert
Dr. Ramesh Chandra Pandey
External member
Mrs. Kavita Nair
Pedagogy expert
What to expect
5 rounds · 18 minutes
A university selection-committee interview in the UGC 2018 pattern, also used for PhD admission and JRF or project-fellow interviews. The chairperson opens from the candidate's academic profile and API record, a subject expert probes domain mastery at research level, an external member tests research methodology and defends the thesis or proposal, and a pedagogy expert asks for a two-minute mini-lecture on a concept. The committee assesses subject mastery, research aptitude, teaching ability and communication, not recall.
- Round 1
Academic profile
· 3:00Set a formal but courteous tone and open the candidate's academic profile as a real selection committee does: research and teaching record, NET or JRF or PhD status, API score components, publications and their venues, and why this institution and this post. Form a first view of honesty and clarity.
Prof. Sudha Raghunathan2–3 questionsup to 1 follow-up each - Round 2
Subject depth
· 6:00Test mastery of the candidate's discipline at postgraduate and research level: conceptual understanding, ability to connect topics, awareness of the current frontier, and whether they can reason when pushed beyond what they have memorised.
Prof. Nikhil Bhattacharya3–4 questionsup to 2 follow-ups each - Round 3
Research methodology & thesis defence
· 4:00Assess research aptitude in the candidate's discipline: how they framed their doctoral or proposed problem, the design and method and its limits, validity and reproducibility, ethics and publication practice, and whether they can defend their work against a referee-style objection and sketch a realistic research plan.
Dr. Ramesh Chandra Pandey2–3 questionsup to 2 follow-ups each - Round 4
Two-minute teaching demonstration
· 4:00Assess whether the candidate can teach: explain one concept from their discipline to a stated undergraduate audience in about two minutes, with a motivating example, correct sequence, and a check for understanding, and then reflect on a pedagogical choice.
Mrs. Kavita Nair1–2 questionsup to 1 follow-up each - Round 5
Closing
· 1:00Close the interview courteously and formally, as a selection committee does, without feedback or any hint about the outcome.
Prof. Sudha Raghunathan1–1 questions
Sample questions
Asst. Prof. PhD interview interview questions
Questions panels commonly ask in the Asst. Prof. PhD interview interview, with what a strong answer covers. Practise them aloud with the AI panel.
- Research proposal
State the research question in your proposal in one sentence. Then tell us which recent papers come closest to answering it and why they fall short.
What a strong answer covers
A single focused question, two or three specific recent works with what they did, and a precise gap such as a missing dataset, an untested assumption or a method that does not scale. Avoid a broad topic like renewable energy or social media with no answerable question.
- Supervisor fit
Which faculty member in this department would you like to work with, and how does your proposal connect to something they have published in the last few years?
What a strong answer covers
Names a faculty member, summarises one recent paper or project accurately, and explains how the proposal extends or complements it, while staying open to adjusting the topic. Avoid naming a professor only from the website list without having read their work.
- Fundamentals
Come to the board and derive the result from your master's course that you are most confident about. We will then ask one question beyond it.
What a strong answer covers
A clean derivation with stated assumptions and correct notation, then a calm attempt at the deeper follow-up that reasons from the derivation rather than from memory. Avoid choosing a result you have only memorised, because the follow-up will expose it.
- Critical reading
Tell us about one paper you read recently whose conclusion you do not fully accept. What would you have done differently?
What a strong answer covers
Summarises the paper's claim and method fairly, identifies a specific weakness such as a confound, small dataset or unjustified assumption, and proposes a concrete alternative design or analysis. Avoid generic criticism like more data is needed without saying what data and why.
- Methodology
Suppose your main experiment or model does not work in the first year. What is your fallback, and would the thesis still be worth writing?
What a strong answer covers
A credible plan B such as a simpler system, a different dataset or an intermediate question that still produces a contribution, plus awareness of how supervisors and committees review progress. Avoid assuming everything will go to plan or having no alternative.
- Programme readiness
PhD students here take coursework and a comprehensive examination in the first year. Which area will you find hardest, and how are you preparing?
What a strong answer covers
Honest identification of a weak area, such as advanced statistics or a core theory course, with a specific preparation plan already started and understanding of what the comprehensive tests. Avoid claiming you have no weak areas.
- Funding
You have qualified NET without JRF. How will you support yourself during the PhD, and what happens if an institute fellowship is delayed by a few months?
What a strong answer covers
Knows the realistic funding routes such as institute fellowships, project positions or teaching assistantships, and has a practical plan for delays. Avoid ignoring finances or assuming funds arrive on time every month.
- Motivation
You have a good job offer in industry. Why give up five years of salary for a PhD?
What a strong answer covers
Genuine curiosity about a specific problem, a long-term goal that needs a doctorate such as academia or research labs, and realistic understanding of the uncertainty and isolation of research. Avoid answers based on the title Dr or failing to find a job.
- Planning
Sketch your timeline from admission to thesis submission. When do you expect your first publication, and what would delay it?
What a strong answer covers
A realistic sequence: coursework, comprehensive, proposal approval, data or experiments, first paper around the second or third year, writing and submission. Identifies risks such as equipment access or ethics approval. Avoid unrealistically short timelines.
Reading is not rehearsing. Answer these out loud to an AI Asst. Prof. PhD interview panel that follows up like the real one.
Practise these questionsMeet the panel
Your AI interviewers
Distinct personas, voices and questioning styles, briefed on this post.
Prof. Sudha Raghunathan
ChairChairperson
Dean of Faculty and Vice-Chancellor's nominee; chairs university selection committees under the UGC 2018 regulations
Formal, precise, courteous, impossible to rush.
Female voice · 3 languages
Prof. Nikhil Bhattacharya
Subject expert
Professor at an IIT; subject expert on university selection committees and departmental research committees
Rigorous, curious, allergic to keyword answers.
Male voice · 4 languages
Dr. Ramesh Chandra Pandey
External member
Research methodology expert; former Dean of Research; reviewer for UGC-CARE journals and DST-SERB project panels
Referee-like, fair, methodical, values honest limitations.
Male voice · 3 languages
Mrs. Kavita Nair
Pedagogy expert
Vice Principal & pedagogy expert
Practical, classroom-focused, encouraging.
Female voice · 4 languages
Languages
Answer in the language you think in
The panel asks in your chosen language. Switch mid-answer if you like.
- English
- हिंदीHindi
How scoring works
A report you can act on
Every round is scored on the rubric
Each interviewer scores only the criteria their round covers. Weights add up to your overall score out of 100.
Only what you actually said counts
Feedback quotes your own answers. Rounds you skip show as “Not assessed” rather than a zero.
Communication is always measured
Fluency, clarity, confidence and structure are tracked across the whole interview, in any language.
Pass mark, then a plan
You see the pass mark for this interview, your gaps, and the courses that close them fastest.
Scored on
- Subject mastery35%
Depth and accuracy at postgraduate and research level: explains the why behind results, connects sub-fields, knows the current frontier of the discipline, corrects a wrong premise, and does not hide behind definitions or name-dropping.
- Research aptitude25%
Can state a research question precisely, justify the design and method, acknowledge limitations honestly, defend a thesis or proposal against a referee-style objection, and outline a realistic research plan with funding and publication awareness.
- Teaching ability20%
Explains a concept to a stated audience in two minutes with a motivating example, correct sequencing and a check for understanding; adapts when the learner is confused; shows awareness of UG assessment and NEP 2020 realities.
- Communication & academic bearing20%
Concise, structured speech; listens to the question actually asked; composure when challenged; admits not knowing without bluffing; collegial tone towards the committee.
Pass mark 60 / 100 · Academic selection committee — Assistant Professor / PhD / JRF
Keep exploring
More Asst. Prof. interviews
- Asst. Prof. Asst. Prof. (Engg.) interviewFaculty, entry grade (Academic Level 10)
- Asst. Prof. Asst. Prof. (Science) interviewFaculty, entry grade (Academic Level 10)
- Asst. Prof. Asst. Prof. (Hum. & SS) interviewFaculty, entry grade (Academic Level 10)
- Asst. Prof. Asst. Prof. (Com. & Mgmt.) interviewFaculty, entry grade (Academic Level 10)
- Asst. Prof. JRF / Project fellow interviewResearch fellowship or project staff